![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
A quiet revolution is sweeping our streets, ridiculed (troped?) in the media, and yet lived by so many people. But what is the truly revolutionary potential of this pan-sexual revolution? How can it not repeat the mistakes of its forebearers? How can it move towards a truly progressive society?
Some points:
-Non-monogamy is subject to the same oppressions as within the macro level society
-In my admittly limited involvement in the non-monogamy movement race and class are not overtly addressed
-Power playing from the kinky folk muddies things in terms of good/bad power
-Kinky folk practicing non-monogamy also have
-How can we make non-monogamy more in line with changing society to a more justice society
-Perceived tensions between non-monogamous sexual radicalism and the traditional racism, etc movements
-Non-monogamy as a “whites-only” movement
-Non-monogamy as part of a larger pansexual movement that includes kink, leather, glbt (~), queer, other radicals (furs, sploshing)
A quiet revolution is sweeping our streets, ridiculed (troped?) in the media, and yet lived by so many people. But what is the truly revolutionary potential of this pan-sexual revolution? How can it not repeat the mistakes of its forebearers? How can it move towards a truly progressive society?
I'm getting the hang of the application of Marxist Class analysis. I think that makes me a Marxist now. Whoppee?! Gonna have to buy Carlin Barton's Roman Honor book. I think I may be able to use it in the development of a new historical sociological analysis.